L'identification de souches de Lactobacillus dans le lait maternel et le fromage blanc a révélé des propriétés probiotiques potentielles avec une activité enzymatique | Rapports scientifiques

Scientific Reports volume 12, Article number: 22522 (2022) Cite this article

18k Accesses

18 Citations

15 Altmetric

Metrics details

The main attempt of this study is to isolate, determine potential probiotic properties and enzyme production of some lactic acid bacteria (LAB). Among all isolates, two LAB strains isolated from human mother milk and cottage cheese revealed antimicrobial activity against some tested pathogenic strains. Both isolates inhibited all the tested pathogens except Escherichia coli. The two isolates were identified by morphological, biochemical properties and then by 16S rRNA gene sequencing technique as Lactobacillus acidophilus SAM1 and Lactiplantibacillus plantarum SAM2. Potential probiotic characters were investigated. Both strains survived in relatively low pH and high bile concentrations and were able to grow at 0.5% of pancreatin concentrations. Their growth decreased by increasing phenol from 0.2% till 0.5%. Both strains did not show hemolytic activity. Coaggregation potential was exhibited by the two strains against Staphylococcus aureus and Candida albicans. Hydrophobicity of Lactobacillus acidophilus SAM1 and Lactiplantibacillus plantarum SAM2, with ethyl acetate; were 88.1% and 82.8%, respectively. Lactobacillus acidophilus SAM1 was susceptible to Ampicillin, Penicillin, Erythromycin, Ciprofloxacin and Tetracycline; on the contrary, it resists Vancomycin and Cefoxitin; while Lactiplantibacillus plantarum SAM2 resists all tested antibiotics. Maximum growth was achieved using glucose as a carbon source and yeast extract as nitrogen source for both strains; however, glucose is the most preferred carbon source for microorganisms and it prevents the uptake of carbon from other sources like yeast by catabolite repression mechanism. Lactobacillus acidophilus SAM1 produces lipase enzyme, while Lactiplantibacillus plantarum SAM2 produces amylase and protease.

Nowadays, popular functional foods as dairy products are enriched with appropriate probiotics and prebiotics or their symbiotic combinations; also these are known to be an excellent chance to improve consumer's health1,2.

From the most frequently used probiotics are bacteria belonging to genus Lactobacillus which is successfully incorporated in functional dairy products. Also, It was proven that a daily dose of 109 viable CFU/mL or g of a dairy product are required for consumption to ensure their health benefits on the consumer3. Health benefits of probiotics include prevention and treatment of diarrhea, lactose intolerance, modulation of gut microbiota, immunomodulation, alleviation of allergies and atopic diseases4.

However, probiotics vary widely according to their beneficial effects on the host. These variations exist at genus and species levels. Therefore, the beneficial effects that related to strain of a specific genus or species might not basically be a representative figure to alternative members of same genus/species. Accordingly, every individual probiotic candidate has to be experimentally investigated separately5.

Lactic acid bacteria (LAB) as Lactobacillus, Bifidobacterium, Streptococcus and Enterococcus species are widely used as probiotics, as they were noted to reduce the symptoms of diarrhea, inflammatory bowel disease and irritable bowel syndrome; these LAB must tolerate acids, bile, pancreatic digestive enzymes, and finally adhere to intestinal epithelium in colon6,7. Growth of LAB is strongly affected by fermentation conditions, including, pH, medium components. Thus, type of growth medium (MRS, M17 and skim milk) is critical for bacterial growth7.

Lactiplantibacillus plantarum species shows various biological effects, as antitumor, anticoagulant, antiviral, immunomodulatory, anti-inflammatory, anti-diabetic and anti-oxidative, consequently; it is taken by children and immunocompromised individuals7. Lactobacillus acidophilus is a commercial probiotic affects human ecosystem due to bacteriocins production and widely used in dairy industry to obtain high-quality fermentation products8.

The main objective of this study is to identify and examine the probiotic properties of LAB, such as acid tolerance, hydrophobicity, auto-aggregation, coagulation, bile salts and antibiotic sensitivity; also, evaluating their enzyme production and studying different carbon and nitrogen sources for maximum LAB growth.

Lactic acid bacteria were isolated from human mother milk, and cottage cheese, yogurt, boiled and unboiled milk, and pickles; all collected from different local dairy product markets.

Informed consents were obtained from all recruited individuals. Also, ethical approval for the study was obtained from the local ethical committee of the Faculty of Science, University of Alexandria, Egypt. All methods were carried out in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations.

Sterile bottles and bags were used to collect samples, to be stored in an ice box until transferred to laboratory for further examinations. One milliliter of each sample was serially diluted using sterile saline solution and spread over selective medium: De Mann, Rogosa Sharpe (MRS) with the following composition (g/l): peptone, 10; beef extract, 10; yeast extract, 5; glucose, 20; tween 80, 1; ammonium citrate, 2; sodium acetate, 5; magnesium sulphate, 0.10; di-potassium phosphate, 2 and agar, 10. The medium pH was adjusted at 6.2 ± 0.2, and then incubated at 37 °C for 24 h9. For obtaining pure culture, separate and morphologically different colonies were isolated and, immediately, sub-cultured on freshly prepared MRS agar plates. All experiments and cultures were done in completely sterile conditions to avoid any fungal contaminations.

Preliminary identification of the bacterial isolates was carried out by colony morphology, cultural characteristics, and microscopic observations. The isolates that were identified as Gram-positive, non-spore forming, and catalase-negative were selected and screened by physiological and biochemical tests, which include; catalase test, oxidase test, indole test, methyl red test, Voges Proskauer (VP) test, citrate utilization, salt tolerance, triple sugar iron test (TSI), arginine dehydrolase, and sugar fermentation test using three different sugars (glucose, lactose and sucrose)10. Isolates were also examined for growth at different temperatures (10, 30 and 45 °C), for motility and endospore formation. Among all collected samples, colonies which were identified as LAB were isolated only from human mother milk and cottage cheese. Then, LAB isolates were stored in 20% (v/v) glycerol at − 20 °C till further analysis.

The most promising isolates which achieved probiotics properties were identified by 16S rRNA gene sequencing analysis by GACT Company-Germany using universal primers; Forward: 5-AGA GTT TGA TCC TGG CTC AG-3 and Reverse: 5-GGT TAC CTT GTT ACG ACT T-3. PCR program was set according to the following cycling parameters: 3 min of initial denaturation at 95 °C, with 35 cycles of 30 s at 95 °C (denaturation), 30 s at 52 °C (annealing) and 2 min at 72 °C (extension), with a final extension at 72 °C for 10 min. NCBI tools as blast analysis and phylogenetic tree method were applied for the providing sequence and deposited to GenBank.

Bacterial cells were harvested, rinsed with phosphate buffer and fixed with 2% glutaraldehyde before being treated by 1% osmium tetraoxide treatment. After completion of fixation, samples were rinsed in buffer solution and dehydrated in ascending order of ethanol concentrations. The samples were thoroughly dried in a critical point drier before being gold-coated in a JEOL-JFG1100 E ion-sputter-coater. Specimens were examined in the Electron Microscope Unit of the Faculty of Science, Alexandria University, using a JEOL-JSM 5300 scanning microscope operating at 20 kV with a beam specimen angle of 45 °C.

Antimicrobial activity of isolates against pathogenic strains was assessed using agar well diffusion method11. 100 μl of pathogenic bacteria as Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Candida albicans (Department of Medical laboratory technology, Faculty of Allied Medical Science, Pharos University in Alexandria), was mixed with soft agar and overlaid on Muller Hinton Agar (MHA). Wells were made on MHA plates using sterile cork borer and 100 μl of overnight LAB isolates culture was poured in them. Plates were allowed to dry and incubated at 37 °C for 24–48 h, and then the presence of the inhibition zone was detected and measured.

Bacterial isolates from 24 h old culture were used to inoculate (1%, v/v) MRS broth adjusted at pH 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6; and to 0.2, 0.4, 0.6, 0.8, 1, 2 and 3% of bile salts then incubated at 37 °C for 48 h. Optical density (OD600nm) was measured. Control cultures were grown on MRS broth without bile salts and pH12,13.

Bacterial isolates from 24 h old culture were inoculated in MRS broth containing 0.5% of pancreatin (Sigma-Aldrich) and cultured at 37 °C for 24 h and OD600nm was measured. The tolerance to phenol was tested by inoculating 100 ml of 24 h old culture into MRS broth containing 0.2% and 0.5% phenol and measuring the OD600nm after 24 h13,14,15.

A 24-h-old bacterial culture was used to inoculate MRS broth containing NaCl (from 1 to 7%, w/v) and incubated at 37 °C for 48 h before measuring OD600nm16.

Hemolytic activity was assessed by inoculating the 24 h old culture on blood agar plates [containing 5% (w/v) sheep blood] and incubated at 37 °C for 48 h and hemolysis zones were observed17.

To investigate the auto-aggregation property of bacteria, cells were harvested (4025 g, 10 min), the pellets were washed and suspended in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). A vortex was used to mix a 4 ml suspension for 15–30 s. After varying time intervals, 0.1 ml from the top layer of cell suspension was taken to 3.9 ml of PBS in a new tube, mixed gently, and OD600nm was measured18. Auto-aggregation percentage (AAg %) was expressed by:

where A0 and At represent the absorbance at 0 h and after time interval of 1, 2, 3, 4 and 24 h, respectively18.

The property of co-aggregation was investigated. LAB and tested pathogens were cultured in MRS broth and nutrient broth, respectively, for 18 h at 37 °C to attain viable counts of approximately 108 CFU/ml (A600 0.85–0.9). 2 ml of individual LAB and pathogen were vortexed for 10 s at 37 °C. 0.1 ml of the top layer of the suspension was removed to a new tube filled with 3.9 ml of PBS and the absorbance (A600) was taken. Controls were set up simultaneously as 4 ml of the individual bacterial cell suspension18. The co-aggregation was calculated by;

where Apat and Aprobio represent absorbance (A600) of the individual bacterial suspensions in control tubes, and A (pat + probio) mix represents the absorbance of the mixed bacterial suspension at different time intervals.

Hydrophobicity was measured using xylene, chloroform, and ethyl acetate. LAB isolates were cultivated in MRS broth for 18 h, and cells were harvested by centrifugation. Cell pellets were rinsed twice with Ringer solution (6 % NaCl, 0.0075 % KCl, 0.01 % CaCl2 and 0.01 % NaHCO3) and suspended in the same solution then A580 nm was measured; using Ringer solution as blank. From the suspension; 1.5 ml was vortexed for 2 min with solvent (xylene, chloroform, or ethyl acetate) by a ratio of 1:1. After 30 minutes of incubation, the aqueous phase was separated carefully, from each solvent, and its OD580 nm was measured18. Hydrophobicity% was calculated by:

where Abs (initial) represent initial absorbance (A580nm), and Abs (solvent) represent the absorbance in the presence of solvent.

Antibiotic susceptibility was assessed by disc diffusion sensitivity method; inoculating 1% of bacterial suspension of OD (0.881) on MHA plates by swabbing technique. Antibiotics discs (Ampicillin; 10 μg/ml, Penicillin; 10 μg/ml, Erythromycin; 15 μg/ml, Chloramphenicol; 10 μg/ml, Tetracycline; 30 μg/ml, Vancomycin; 30 μg/ml, Cefoxitin; 30 μg/ml,) were deposited and incubated at 30 °C for 24 h. By referring to the inhibitory zone around antibiotic discs, susceptibility breaking-point to various antibiotics was examined19.

To detect amylase, protease and lipase activity the culture was inoculated into appropriate media and the zone of clearance was determined. For amylase activity, the bacterial strains were spread into modified MRS media (0.5% peptone, 0.7% yeast extract, 0.2% NaCl, 2% starch, and 1.5% agar) supplemented with 0.25% of starch. After incubation; the zone of clearance was identified by applying Gram’s iodine as detecting agent20. For protease activity, 50 ml of cell free extract was inoculated onto agar medium containing skimmed milk (1%) and incubated for 48 h. After incubation; the zone of clearance was observed and measured21. The activity of lipase was also measured in a medium containing olive oil (1%). MRS broth containing olive oil (1%) and Arabic gum was inoculated with 50 ml of cell free supernatant (1%). The zone was observed by adding phenol red after 48 h of incubation22. Qualitative extracellular enzyme activity was observed by the appearance of halo diameter in mm around the colony, which was presented as scores as follows: nil (no halo); +, low (1–4 mm halo); ++, intermediate (5–8 mm halo); +++, high (9–12 mm halo); ++++, very high (≥ 13 mm halo)23.

The main sugar in original MRS medium [glucose (dextrose)] was substituted with equivalent weight of different carbon sources as sucrose, maltose, starch, fructose, mannitol and without main carbon source. 50 ml of medium in each flask was inoculated with an overnight culture of the probiotic strain 2% (v/v) and incubated at 37 °C for 24 h., and then OD600 nm was measured.

The main nitrogen sources in original MRS medium; were substituted in an equivalent weight with different nitrogen sources as; beef extract, peptone, yeast extract, ammonium chloride, ammonium sulphate, casein and sodium nitrate. 50 ml medium in each flask was inoculated with an overnight culture of the probiotic strain 2% (v/v) and incubated at 37 °C for 24 h, and then OD600nm was measured.

All the experiments were performed in triplicates, and the data were expressed as the means ± standard deviation of three independent replicates. Comparison between the means of the LAB isolates was analyzed using one-way ANOVA with Fisher’s least significant difference test. Differences were considered significant at P < 0.05. The gathered data were analyzed using IBM SPSS version 24.0.

Among all collected samples, only two LAB isolates were identified; one from human mother milk (Lactobacillus acidophilus SAM1) and one from cottage cheese (Lactiplantibacillus plantarum SAM2). They revealed antimicrobial activity and have probiotic properties. Morphologically, colonies were circle, raised, smooth with entire margin, creamy, and slightly translucent. Microscopically, the strains were identified as Gram positive, rod-shaped, arranged in pairs or forming chains, non-motile, and non-spore former. Concerning the biochemical and physiological features, the two strains were catalase, oxidase, indole, VP, and arginine negative, and positive for methyl red only by Lactobacillus acidophilus SAM1, while in the citrate utilization test only Lactiplantibacillus plantarum SAM2 was positive. Both, can grow in a medium containing 2% and 4% NaCl (as explained later, in NaCl tolerance) and at 30–45 °C. Each strain can ferment different sugars (glucose, lactose and sucrose) with acid production, however, gas production was only indicated with Lactobacillus acidophilus SAM1. In the Triple Sugar-Iron (TSI) test; the two strains can change the media colour from orange to yellow; meaning that sugar fermentation took place (Supplementary material, Table 1).

The two isolates were identified by 16s rRNA sequencing method. The similarity was 100% for the two selected predominant strains. Nucleotide sequence was submitted to GenBank sequence database, and given accession numbers which are ON495959 and ON527739 for Lactobacillus acidophilus SAM1 and Lactiplantibacillus plantarum SAM2, respectively (Fig. 1A,B).

The phylogenetic tree of identified strains according to the partial sequence of 16S rRNA; (A) Lactobacillus acidophilus SAM1, (B) Lactiplantibacillus plantarum SAM2.

Shape and arrangements of the two target strains, Lactobacillus acidophilus SAM1 and Lactiplantibacillus plantarum SAM2, were observed by SEM. The cells appear as long rod shaped attached in pairs and sometimes form chains (Fig. 2).

Scanning electron micrographs of cells; (A) overview of Lactobacillus acidophilus SAM1, (B) overview of Lactiplantibacillus plantarum SAM2.

Lactobacillus acidophilus SAM1 and Lactiplantibacillus plantarum SAM2 were examined for their antimicrobial activity. It was noticed that both strains inhibited the growth of most of the tested pathogens with inhibition zone of 2 ± 0.21, 1.8 ± 0.183, and 1.5 ± 0.136 cm against Candida albicans, Staphylococcus aureus, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa, respectively; by Lactobacillus acidophilus SAM1, and 1.8 ± 0.164, 1.7 ± 0.113, and 1.3 ± 0.130 cm against the same tested pathogens for Lactiplantibacillus plantarum SAM2. While E. coli, was resistant to the both strains as shown in Table 1.

Growth of Lactobacillus acidophilus SAM1, significantly, increased gradually from pH 2 till reaching pH 6.5 with O.D. about 1.65 ± 0.110 (P = 0.001). The same growth increasing trend was noticed for Lactiplantibacillus plantarum SAM2 which rose gradually till pH 6.5 giving O.D. about 1.23 ± 0.082 (P = 0.001). That is meaning; both LAB strains showed a remarkable acidic tolerance pattern, as indicated in Fig. 3.

Acid tolerance of the LAB strains.

The present study also revealed bile salt tolerance at different bile salt concentrations for both LAB strains. The experiment reported a significant higher survival rate for L. plantarum SAM2, in 0.3% bile, with a marked growth rate of 78.3%; than that of L. acidophilus SAM1, which gave a viability rate of 67.4%; after 24 h incubation at 37 °C (P = 0.001). By increasing concentration of bile salts, the growth rate was, significantly, reduced (P = 0.001) (Fig. 4).

Bile salt tolerance of the LAB strains.

The present study reported a significant growth for both strains in 0.5% pancreatin, and the measured O.D. were 1.78 ± 0.148 and 1.77 ± 0.126, for L. acidophilus SAM1 and L. plantarum SAM2, respectively.

There was a good tolerance of tested strains toward phenol; even if the growth in presence of phenol was lower than in MRS broth (zero phenol) for 24 h incubation. Viability rate of the two LAB strains was, significantly, decreased gradually by increasing phenol concentration (P = 0.001). However, Lactobacillus acidophilus SAM1 showed a higher phenol resistance in comparison with Lactiplantibacillus plantarum SAM2 (Fig. 5).

Effect of phenol concentrations on the growth of LAB strains.

Both LAB strains showed tolerance to different NaCl concentrations from 1 to 7% with a gradual decline in the viability. No viability was detected for both LAB strains by increasing NaCl concentration above 7%. Maximum growth was measured for Lactobacillus acidophilus SAM1 by O.D. equal to 2.52 ± 0.194 at 1% NaCl concentration; also, the growth for Lactiplantibacillus plantarum SAM2 was measured to be with O.D. equal to 1.93 ± 0.148 (Fig. 6).

Effect of NaCl concentration on the growth of LAB strains.

Lactobacillus acidophilus SAM1 and Lactiplantibacillus plantarum SAM2, exhibited γ-hemolytic activity (no hemolysis) when cultivated on blood agar (Supplementary material, Fig. 1).

The two LAB strains showed good auto-aggregation ability as represented in Fig. 7. Auto-aggregation property increased gradually with different incubation time till reaching remarkable auto-aggregation ability after 24 h at 37 °C, which were 52.39 and 65.32 for L. acidophilus SAM1 and L. plantarum SAM2, respectively.

Auto-aggregation ability (%) of LAB strains.

Marked co-aggregation potential was also exhibited by the two LAB strains against the tested pathogens Staphylococcus aureus and Candida albicans. The co-aggregation abilities that detected for L. acidophilus SAM1 and L. plantarum SAM2 were 73.23% and 81.78%, respectively against S. aureus, and showed 78.45% and 79.22%, respectively toward C. albicans after 24 h of incubation at 37 °C (Fig. 8).

Co-aggregation ability (%) of LAB strains against pathogens.

The maximum hydrophobicities of L. acidophilus SAM1 and L. plantarum SAM2 were found to be 88.1% and 82.8% with ethyl acetate, respectively. Additionally, marked hydrophobicities were also detected for both L. acidophilus SAM1 and L. plantarum SAM2 with chloroform and xylene, but lower than those for ethyl acetate, as shown in Fig. 9.

Hydrophobicity (%) of LAB strains with different organic solvents.

Results showed that L. acidophilus SAM1 was susceptible to all tested antibiotics; Ampicillin and Penicillin (from the β-lactam group of antibiotics), Erythromycin (from the macrolide group), Ciprofloxacin (from quinolones), and Tetracycline. A remarkable resistance of this strain was observed toward Vancomycin and Cefoxitin. However, L. plantarum SAM2 showed good resistance to all tested antibiotics; that was noticed by the absence of inhibitory zone around antibiotic discs (Supplementary material, Table 2).

The extracellular lipase production by L. acidophilus SAM1 was observed by the zone of clearance measuring 11 mm around the colony, when treated with phenol red. L. plantarum SAM2 exhibited production ability for both protease and amylase enzymes with a halozones of 4 and 3 mm, respectively, when using skimmed milk in the production medium for protease detection and iodine for amylase detection (Table 2).

The effect of different carbon sources on the growth rate of L. acidophilus SAM1 and L. plantarum SAM2 was examined. The results in Fig. 10 indicated that the original carbon source (glucose) has a marked inducing effect on the growth of L. acidophilus SAM1 and L. plantarum SAM2, with O.D. equal to 1.66 ± 0.111 and 0.93 ± 0.066; respectively. Also, it has been shown that glucose inducing effect on the growth of the two LAB strains was significantly higher, as compared to other carbon sources (P = 0.001). On the other hand, maltose triggered a very significant good growth of L. acidophilus SAM1 when compared to L. plantarum SAM2, with O.D. equal to 0.994 ± 0.090 and 0.066 ± 0.007; respectively.

Influence of different carbon sources on growth of LAB strains.

The effect of different nitrogen sources on growth rates of L. acidophilus SAM1 and L. plantarum SAM2 was also investigated. The best used nitrogen source was yeast extract as illustrated in Fig. 11. Yeast extract showed a significant highest growth rates among other nitrogen sources, with O.D. equal to 1.81 ± 0.139 and 1.96 ± 0.131 for L. acidophilus SAM1 and L. plantarum SAM2; respectively (P = 0.001).

Influence of different nitrogen sources on growth of LAB strains.

Lactic acid bacteria were isolated from different sources, and their probiotic potential was examined. Only two strains were identified as Lactobacillus acidophilus SAM1 (from human mother milk) and Lactiplantibacillus plantarum SAM2 (from cottage cheese). The two strains were Gram-positive bacilli, non-spore forming, and tested negative for catalase, oxidase, indole, MR-VP negative and positive for glucose and sucrose which is similar to that reported by Tallapragada et al.24.

A promising probiotic bacterial isolate should tolerate low pH in the GIT environment25. Lactobacillus acidophilus SAM1 and Lactiplantibacillus plantarum SAM2 showed maximum tolerance; due to the great ability of lactobacilli to adapt for acid during their growth in MRS broth26.

Findings of Dave and Shah (1998) and Liong and Shah (2005) stated that probiotic standard cultures could resist acidic pH value (pH 3)27,28. While Todorov et al.29 reported that maximum growth of L. plantarum ST16Pa was noticed at pH 4 and 5. L. plantarum, L. rhamnosus, L. pentosus, and L. paracasei achieved low growth at pH 2 and 329. Previous researchers mentioned that different concentrations of hydrogen ion have had a strong effect on the bacterial survival30. Another study has reported that acids such as hydrochloric acid found in human stomach could disrupt the cell biomolecules, such as fatty acids, proteins and DNA31. Acidic pH environments may inhibit metabolism and reduce the viability of Lactobacilli. Other studies have shown that upon exposure to gastric acid with a pH of 2; a significant reduction in the number of bacteria could be recognized31,32. Alameri et al.33 mentioned that; probiotics should possess good resistance toward bile salts in order to survive in the human GIT. Therefore, high survival percentages indicate good bile salt tolerance. Bile plays an important role in the specific and nonspecific intestinal defense mechanism of the gut, and the severity of its inhibitory action is primarily determined by bile salt concentrations34. In this study, Lactobacillus acidophilus SAM1 exhibited a moderate tolerance to bile salt while Lactiplantibacillus plantarum SAM2 showed a significant tolerance; these finding were in accordance by those of Jamaly et al.35 who reported that L. plantarum, L.paracasei and L. brevis could resist 0.3% Ox-bile, additionally Kim et al.36 listed that L. gasseri, L. acidophilus and L. brevis could grew when exposed to 1% bile and more. Similar results have been obtained by Yasmin et al.30. The potential of the studied strains differs from that of other strains in acid and bile tolerance, that could be due to differences in cell wall structure as suggested by Conway et al.37. However, Boke et al.38 mentioned that, lactic acid bacterial exopolysaccharides should be used to protect microbial cells from acidic pH and bile salts. Pancreatic enzymes are secreted into the small intestine via the pancreatic duct and are involved in the digestion of proteins, carbohydrates, and fats in foods. A criterion for probiotic bacteria selection is the ability to tolerate the presence of pancreatic enzymes, which are present in 0.5% of the human gastrointestinal tract. Those findings were in accordance with our results that showed the ability of Lactobacillus acidophilus SAM1 and Lactiplantibacillus plantarum SAM2 to survive at 0.5% pancreatin, and also supported by other studies which proved that many Lactobacillus strains showed strong growth at 0.5% of pancreatin14,39. Remarkable decline was noticed in the growth rate of Lactobacillus acidophilus SAM1 and Lactiplantibacillus plantarum SAM2 by increasing the phenol concentration. Phenols can be produced in the intestine due to bacterial deamination of aromatic amino acids derived from dietary and endogenous proteins, these compounds have been shown to have bacteriostatic properties in vitro as mentioned by Suskovic et al.40. Additionally, Xanthopoulos et al.41, noticed that a bacteriostatic activity in many microorganisms was mentioned when 0.4% phenol existed. Also Raja et al. (2009) and Hoque et al. (2010) listed that isolated Lactobacillus spp. could resist the inhibitory effect of 0.4% phenol42,43. It has been known that LAB strains are capable of tolerating high salt concentrations. Because, salt has a metabolic role in LAB which leads to lactic acid production that, further, inhibits the growth of unwanted microorganisms. NaCl in medium forces the bacterial cells to lose their turgor pressure which, in turn, affects their enzymes and water activities. Consequently, LAB neutralizes that effect by inducing osmolytes to regulate the inside and outside pressure13. Similarly, our findings showed that the growth of the two isolated strains decreased gradually by increasing the concentration of NaCl. Jeronymo-Ceneviva et al.44 stated that Lactobacillus strains isolated from dairy product showed survival in presence of NaCl (1–7%), proving their high sodium chloride tolerance. Hemolysis is a critical virulence factor for pathogenic microorganisms. Hemolytic activity of the two strains was investigated in the current study. Results showed ɤ-hemolysis (non-hemolytic) which considered a safe prerequisite for the selected probiotic strain as stated by Araya45. Similar observations have been reported by Maragkoudakis et al.39 in which; Lactobacillus species isolated from dairy products have been shown to be non-haemolytic. On the contrary, another study reported only few LAB isolates have shown hemolytic activity46. Aggregation between microorganisms of the same strain [auto-aggregation (AAg)] or between genetically different strains (co-aggregation) is of a great significance in numerous ecological niches, especially in human intestine4,5. Based on AAg ability, strains were categorized into: (1) high (HAAg, 70% AAg), (2) medium (MAAg, 20–70% AAg) and (3) low (LAAg, 20% AAg). Medium AAg ability was observed in our findings to be; 52.39% and 65.32% for Lactobacillus acidophilus SAM1 and Lactiplantibacillus plantarum SAM2, respectively. Previous research of Collado et al.47 reported the linkage between the aggregation ability and the cell adherence properties. Todorov et al.48 stated that; Co-aggregation may be important in removing pathogens from the human GIT; by preventing their attachment to the host tissue, where Lactobacillus strains may form a barrier to prevent pathogen colonization via co-aggregation as stated by Ferreira et al.49. Co-aggregation with a potential pathogen allows the probiotic strain to produce antimicrobial substances in close proximity, which may limit pathogenic strain growth in the gastrointestinal tract as mentioned by Reid et al.50. The varying degrees of co-aggregation of LAB isolates with different pathogens demonstrated that co-aggregation potential is a unique feature that varies depending on the type of probiotic strain and the pathogens as deduced by Cao et al.51. Isolates in the current research model had a remarkable potential for S. aureus and C. albicans co-aggregation. Co-aggregation and AAg have been found to be directly related properties. The results were in agreement with the previous reports of Razdan et al. (2012) and Balakrishna (2013)13,52. Differences in co-aggregation and AAg levels may be explained by the nature of probiotic/pathogenic cell surface components as listed by Bajaj et al. (2019) and Kumar Bajaj et al. (2014)4,5. Bacteria with more hydrophobic surfaces are more receptive to milk fat and aroma compounds53. Our strains had different high surface hydrophobicity (SHb) in different solvents. Adherence to intestinal epithelium is an important criterion for probiotic selection because it aids in colonization of the GIT, which is required for beneficial effects to be exerted4. Bacterial adhesion is defined by cell surface hydrophobicity (SHb), which is observed by the ability of bacteria to adhere to hydrocarbons. Overall SHb of our isolates for ethyl acetate and chloroform appears to be much higher than for xylene, which were in consistence with previous reports stated by Perez Ibarreche et al. (2014) and Bajaj et al. (2015); who showed that LAB strains revealed a greater adhesion to the basic solvent ethyl acetate than to the acidic solvent chloroform54,55. Our experiments deduced that; Lactobacillus acidophilus SAM1 was susceptible to all tested antibiotics, except; Vancomycin and Cefoxitin, while Lactiplantibacillus plantarum SAM2, could resist all the antibiotics used in this test. Coppola et al.56 was in agreement with our results concerning tetracycline sensitivity. However, this can be attributed to L. acidophilus is a mutant, or a higher concentration of the antibiotic may be used. Our investigations illustrated the great ability of Lactobacillus acidophilus SAM1 for lipase production, while, Lactiplantibacillus plantarum SAM2, showed a low ability for protease and amylase production. These were in accordance with what were mentioned in the studies of Zhi-gang et al. (2014) and Bogale and Prapulla (2015), in which; the ability of probiotics to produce hydrolytic enzymes such as amylase, lipase, and protease is desirable because these enzymes aid in digestive tract metabolism, this property was determined qualitatively by observing clear halo zones around colonies on MRS agar medium plates and many LAB isolates demonstrated varying degrees of amylase production capability57,58. Also, Tallapragada et al.24 stated that various strains of Lactiplantibacillus plantarum produced the most amylase, which was also supported by what was noticed by Garcia-Cano et al.59, in which, Lactobacillus sp. G3 4 1TO2 produced the most amylase with an average diameter of 1.23 mm of halo zone with additional observations concerning high lipolytic and proteolytic activity by L. plantarum OSU-PECh-A and L. plantarum OSU-PECh-BB. Sato et al.60 reinforced our observations; by detecting the lipolytic activity of Lactobacillus casei L-7, Lactobacillus acidophilus L-14, Lactobacillus plantarum L-34, and Lactobacillus helveticus L-53.

Original carbon source (Glucose) in current experiments has an enhancing effect on the growth of Lactobacillus acidophilus SAM1 and Lactiplantibacillus plantarum SAM2. This was in accordance with the investigations reported by Chen et al.61 who mentioned that there were significant differences between various carbon sources on the growth of Lactobacillus acidophilus. While, whey powder and glucose showed a noticeable good effect on the growth of Lactobacillus acidophilus. However, Maltose could result in a maximum production level of Lactobacillus plantarum ST23LD antimicrobial agents as mentioned by Todorov and Dicks (2006) and Mitra et al. (2007)62,63.

Our investigations in this study showed that yeast extract when used as a nitrogen source can led to the maximum rate for growth of our isolated strains. Similarly, Chen et al.61 reported that, organic nitrogen source could promote better growth of Lactobacillus acidophilus than inorganic nitrogen source. Their results showed that yeast extract and peptone were ideal nitrogen sources of Lactobacillus acidophilus61. Finally, the results of the present investigation collectively indicate that the Lactobacillus acidophilus SAM1 and Lactiplantibacillus plantarum SAM2, could be characterized as probiotic strains naturally occurring in the human mother milk, and cottage cheese as not prepared using human milk; respectively. Moreover, SAM1 and SAM2 showed potential and promising antimicrobial activities; therefore, can indicate the possibility of using the two isolates in therapeutic and prophylactic fields as natural and biological sources of antimicrobial substances, with the ability to produce different extracellular enzymes as amylase, lipase and protease. Consequently; the two isolates could share in many different industrial fields.

The datasets generated and/or analysed during the current study are available in the GeneBank (NCBI-Nucleotide Database) repository as following: 1.Lactobacillus acidophilus strain SAM1 16S ribosomal RNA gene, partial sequence under accession number ON495959.1 (Link: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/ON495959)2.Lactiplantibacillus plantarum strain SAM2 16S ribosomal RNA gene, partial sequence under accession number ON527739.1 (Link: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/ON527739).

Vemuri, R., Gundamaraju, R. & Eri, R. Role of lactic acid probiotic bacteria in IBD. Curr. Pharm. Des. 23, 2352–2355 (2017).

Article Google Scholar

Kareba, O. B. et al. Effect of electro-activated sweet whey on growth of Bifidobacterium, Lactobacillus, and Streptococcus strains under model growth conditions. Food Res. Int. 103, 316–325 (2018).

Article Google Scholar

Ranadheera, R., Baines, S. & Adams, M. Importance of food in probiotic efficacy. Food Res. Int. 43(1), 1–7 (2010).

Article Google Scholar

Bajaj, B. K., Claes, I. J. J. & Lebeer, S. Functional mechanisms of probiotics. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. Food Sci. 04(04), 321–327 (2015).

Article Google Scholar

Kumar Bajaj, B., Andrabi, T., Jj Claes, I. & Lebeer, S. Bioprospecting for functionally-proficient potential probiotics. Curr. Nutr. Food Sci. 10(4), 251–263 (2014).

Article Google Scholar

Vemuri, R. et al. A human origin strain Lactobacillus acidophilus DDS-1 exhibits superior in vitro probiotic efficacy in comparison to plant or dairy origin probiotics. Int. J. Med. Sci. 15, 25 (2018).

Article Google Scholar

Yoo, H., Rheem, I., Rheem, S. & Oh, S. optimizing medium components for the maximum growth of Lactobacillus plantarum JNU 2116 using response surface methodology. Korean J. Food Sci. Anim. Resour. 38(2), 240–250 (2018).

Google Scholar

Felicio, T. L. et al. Physico-chemical changes during storage and sensory acceptance of low sodium probiotic Minas cheese added with arginine. Food Chem. 196, 628–637. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2015.09.102 (2016).

Article Google Scholar

Dave, R. I. & Shah, N. P. Evaluation of media for selective enumeration of Streptococcus thermophilus, Lactobacillus delbrueckii ssp. bulgaricus, Lactobacillus acidophilus, and bifidobacteria. J. Dairy Sci. 79(9), 1529–1536 (1996).

Article Google Scholar

Holt, J. G. Bergey’s Manual of Systematic Bacteriology (Williams and Wilkins, 1984).

Google Scholar

Ridwan, B. U. et al. Antimicrobial activity of a multispecies probiotic (Ecologic 641) against pathogens isolated from infected pancreatic necrosis. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 46(1), 61–67 (2008).

Google Scholar

Bassyouni, R. H., Abdel-all, W. S., Abdel-all, M. G. F. S. & Kamel, Z. Characterization of lactic acid bacteria isolated from dairy products in Egypt as a probiotic. Life Sci. J. 9(4), 2924–2930 (2012).

Google Scholar

Razdan, K., Parihar, J. & Bajaj, B. K. Isolation and characterization of a lipolytic and phytase producing probiotic for potential application in poultry feed. Online J. Anim. Feed Res. 2, 369–377 (2012).

Google Scholar

Khagwal, N., Sharma, P. K. & Sharma, D. C. Screening and evaluation of Lactobacillus spp. For the development of potential probiotics. Afr. J. Microbiol. Res. 8(15), 1573–1579 (2014).

Article Google Scholar

Sundarram, A. & Murthy, T. P. K. α-amylase production and applications: A review. J. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2(4), 166–175 (2014).

Google Scholar

Rhaiem, N. et al. The Isolation of lactic acid bacteria with a conservatory power. Res. Rev. BioSci. 10, 132–136 (2015).

Google Scholar

Hargrove, R. E. & Alford, J. A. Growth rate and feed efficiency of rats fed yogurt and other fermented milks. J. Dairy Sci. 61(1), 11–19 (1978).

Article Google Scholar

Ramos, C. L., Thorsen, L., Schwan, R. F. & Jespersen, L. Strain-specific probiotics properties of Lactobacillus fermentum, Lactobacillus plantarum and Lactobacillus brevis isolates from Brazilian food products. Food Microbiol. 36(1), 22–29 (2013).

Article Google Scholar

Sahraoui, Y., Fayolle, K., Leriche, F., Le Flèche-Matéos, A. & Sadoun, D. Antibacterial and technological properties of Lactococcus lactis ssp. lactis KJ660075 strain selected for its inhibitory power against Staphylococcus aureus for cheese quality improving. J. Food Sci. Technol. 52(11), 7133–7142 (2015).

Article Google Scholar

Madhav, K., Verma, S. & Tanta, R. Isolation of amylase producing Bacillus species, from soil sample of different regions in Dehradun and to check the effect of pH and temperature on their amylase activity. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 12, 12 (2011).

Google Scholar

Brammacharry, U. & Muthaiah, M. Production and characterization of protease enzyme from Bacillus laterosporus. Afr. J. Microbiol. Res. 4(11), 180–186 (2009).

Google Scholar

Kovatcheva-Datchary, P. & Arora, T. Best practice and research clinical. Gastroenterology 27, 59–72 (2017).

Google Scholar

NavinChandran, M. et al. Influence of probiotic bacterium Bacillus cereus isolated from the gut of wild shrimp Penaeus monodon in turn as a potent growth promoter and immune enhancer in P. monodon. Fish. Shellf. Immunol. 36(1), 38–45 (2014).

Article Google Scholar

Tallapragada, P., Bhargavi, R., Priyanka, P., Niranjan, N. & Pavitra, P. Screening of potential probiotic lactic acid bacteria and production of amylase and its partial purification. J. Genet. Eng. Biotechnol. 20, 16 (2018).

Google Scholar

Nithya, V. & Halami, P. M. Evaluation of the probiotic characteristics of Bacillus species isolated from different food sources. Ann. Microbiol. 63(1), 129–137 (2013).

Article Google Scholar

Hassanzadazar, H., Ehsani, A., Mardani, K. & Hesari, J. Investigation of antibacterial, acid and bile tolerance properties of lactobacilli isolated from Koozeh cheese. Vet. Res. Forum 3(3), 181–185 (2012).

Google Scholar

Dave, R. I. & Shah, N. P. Ingredient supplementation effects on viability of probiotic bacteria in yogurt. J. Dairy Sci. 81(11), 2804–2816 (1998).

Article Google Scholar

Liong, M. T. & Shah, N. P. Acid and bile tolerance and cholesterol removal ability of lactobacilli strains. J. Dairy Sci. 88(1), 55–66 (2005).

Article Google Scholar

Todorov, S. D., LeBlanc, J. G. & Franco, B. D. G. M. Evaluation of the probiotic potential and effect of encapsulation on survival for Lactobacillus plantarum ST16Pa isolated from papaya. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 28(3), 973–984 (2012).

Article Google Scholar

Yasmin, I. et al. In vitro probiotic potential and safety evaluation (hemolytic, cytotoxic activity) of Bifidobacterium strains isolated from raw Camel milk. Microorganisms 8(354), 1–21 (2020).

Google Scholar

Sahadeva, R. P. K. et al. Survival of commercial probiotic strains to pH and bile. Int. Food Res. J. 18(4), 1515–1522 (2011).

Google Scholar

Mandal, S., Hati, S., Puniya, A. K., Khamrui, K. & Singh, K. Enhancement of survival of alginate-encapsulated Lactobacillus casei NCDC 298. J. Sci. Food Agric. 94(10), 1994–2001 (2014).

Article Google Scholar

Alameri, F. et al. Lactic acid bacteria isolated from fresh vegetable products: Potential probiotic and postbiotic characteristics including immunomodulatory effects. Microorganisms 10, 389 (2022).

Article Google Scholar

Argyri, A. A. et al. Selection of potential probiotic lactic acid bacteria from fermented olives by in vitro tests. Food Microbiol. 33, 282–291 (2013).

Article Google Scholar

Jamaly, N., Benjouad, A. & Bouksaim, M. Probiotic potential of Lactobacillus strains isolated from known popular traditional Moroccan dairy products. Br. Microbiol. Res. J. 1(4), 79 (2011).

Article Google Scholar

Kim, H. S. et al. Antioxidative and probiotic properties of Lactobacillus gasseri NLRI-312 isolated from Korean infant feces. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 19(9), 1335–1341 (2006).

Article Google Scholar

Conway, P. L., Gorbach, S. L. & Goldin, B. R. Survival of lactic acid bacteria in the human stomach and adhesion to intestinal cells. J. Dairy Sci. 70(1), 1–12 (1987).

Article Google Scholar

Boke, H., Aslim, B. & Alp, G. The role of resistance to bile salts and acid tolerance of exopolysaccharides (EPSS) produced by yogurt starter bacteria. Arch. Biol. Sci. 62(2), 323–328 (2010).

Article Google Scholar

Maragkoudakis, P. A. et al. Probiotic potential of Lactobacillus strains isolated from dairy products. Int. Dairy J. 16(3), 189–199 (2006).

Article Google Scholar

Šušković, J., Brkić, B., Matošić, S. & Marić, V. Lactobacillus acidophilus M92 as potential probiotic strain. Milchwissenschaft 52(8), 430–435 (1997).

Google Scholar

Xanthopoulos, V., Litopoulou-Tzanetaki, E. & Tzanetakis, N. Characterization of Lactobacillus isolates from infant faeces as dietary adjuncts. Food Microbiol. 17(2), 205–215 (2000).

Article Google Scholar

Raja, M. M. M., Raja, A. & Imran, M. M. Lactobacillus as a probiotic feed for chickens. Int. J. Poult. Sci. 8(8), 763–767 (2009).

Article Google Scholar

Hoque, M. Z. et al. Isolation, identification and analysis of probiotic properties of Lactobacillus spp. from selective regional yoghurts. World J. Dairy. Food Sci. 5(1), 39–46 (2010).

Google Scholar

Jeronymo-Ceneviva, A. B. et al. Probiotic properties of lactic acid bacteria isolated from water-buffalo mozzarella cheese. Prob. Antim. Prot. 6(3–4), 141–156 (2014).

Google Scholar

Araya, M. (2002). Guidelines for the evaluation of probiotics in food. Report of a joint FAO/WHO working group on drafting guidelines for the evaluation of probiotics in food, London, Ontario, Canada.

Sieladie, D. V., Zambou, N. F., Kaktcham, P. M., Cresci, A. & Fonteh, F. Probiotic properties of Lactobacilli strains isolated from raw cow milk in the Western Highlands of Cameroon. Innov. Roman. Food Biotechnol. 9, 12–28 (2011).

Google Scholar

Collado, M. C., Meriluoto, J. & Salminen, S. Adhesion and aggregation properties of probiotic and pathogen strains. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 226(5), 1065–1073 (2008).

Article Google Scholar

Todorov, S. D. et al. Boza, a natural source of probiotic lactic acid bacteria. J. Appl. Microbiol. 104(2), 465–477 (2008).

Google Scholar

Ferreira, C. L., Grześkowiak, L., Collado, M. C. & Salminen, S. In vitro evaluation of Lactobacillus gasseri strains of infant origin on adhesion and aggregation of specific pathogens. J. Food Prot. 74(9), 1482–1487 (2011).

Article Google Scholar

Reid, G., McGroarty, J. A., Angotti, R. & Cook, R. L. Lactobacillus inhibitor production against Escherichia coli and coaggregation ability with uropathogens. Can. J. Microbiol. 34(3), 344–351 (1988).

Article Google Scholar

Cao, Z. et al. In vitro evaluation of probiotic potential of lactic acid bacteria isolated from Yunnan De’ang pickled tea. Prob. Antim. Prot. 11(1), 103–112 (2019).

Google Scholar

Balakrishna, A. In vitro evaluation of adhesion and aggregation abilities of four potential probiotic strains isolated from guppy (Poecilia reticulata). Brazil. Arch. Biol. Technol. 56(5), 793–800 (2013).

Article Google Scholar

Ly, M. H. et al. Interactions between bacterial surfaces and milk proteins, impact on food emulsions stability. Food Hydrocolloids 22(5), 742–751 (2008).

Article Google Scholar

Pérez Ibarreche, M., Castellano, P. & Vignolo, G. Evaluation of anti-Listeria meat borne Lactobacillus for biofilm formation on selected abiotic surfaces. Meat. Sci. 96(1), 295–303 (2014).

Article Google Scholar

Bajaj, B. K., Razdan, K., Claes, I. J. J. & Lebeer, S. Probiotic attributes of the newly isolated lactic acid bacteria from infants’gut. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. Food Sci. 05(02), 109–115 (2015).

Article Google Scholar

Coppola, R. et al. Antibiotic susceptibility of Lactobacillus rhamnosus strains isolated from Parmigiano Reggiano cheese. Lait 85(3), 193–204 (2005).

Article Google Scholar

Zhi-gang, T., Naeem, M., Chao, W., Tian, W. & Yan-min, Z. Effect of dietary probiotics supplementation with different nutrient density on growth performance, nutrient retention and digestive enzyme activities in broilers. J. Anim. Plant. Sci. 24, 1309–1315 (2014).

Google Scholar

Bogale, A. T. & Prapulla, S. G. Studies on amylase from probiotic lactic acid bacteria. Int. J. Mod. Chem. Appl. Sci. 2(4), 211–214 (2015).

Google Scholar

García-Cano, I. et al. Lactic acid bacteria isolated from dairy products as potential producers of lipolytic, proteolytic and antibacterial proteins. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 103(13), 5243–5257 (2019).

Article Google Scholar

Sato, Y., Umemoto, Y. & Iwayama, S.i.,. Studies on lipolysis of dairy lactic acid bacteria: Part I on the lipolytic actions of cell suspensions of lactic acid bacteria upon various fats. Nip. Nōgeik. Kaishi 41(11), 585–591 (1967).

Article Google Scholar

Chen, H. et al. Optimization of the medium for Lactobacillus acidophilus by Plackett–Burman and steepest ascent experiment. Acta. Sci. Pol. Technol. Aliment. 14(3), 227–232 (2015).

Article Google Scholar

Todorov, S. D. & Dicks, L. M. Effect of medium components on bacteriocin production by Lactobacillus plantarum strains ST23LD and ST341LD, isolated from spoiled olive brine. Microbiol. Res. 161(2), 102–108 (2006).

Article Google Scholar

Mitra, S., Chakrabartty, P. K. & Biswas, S. R. Production of nisin z by Lactococcus lactis isolated from dahi. J. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 143, 41–53 (2007).

Article Google Scholar

Download references

Authors appreciate the grate cooperation offered at the Botany and Microbiology Departments, Faculty of Science, Alexandria University and Damanhour University, Egypt, for their help and support. Also, authors thank all members of Medical Laboratory Technology Department, Faculty of Applied Health Sciences Technology , Pharos University in Alexandria, Egypt.

Open access funding provided by The Science, Technology & Innovation Funding Authority (STDF) in cooperation with The Egyptian Knowledge Bank (EKB).

Botany and Microbiology Department, Faculty of Science, Damanhour University, El-Beheira, Egypt

Abeer I. M. EL-Sayed

Botany and Microbiology Department, Faculty of Science, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt

Aliaa M. El-Borai & Samy A. EL-Aassar

Medical Laboratory Technology Department, Faculty of Applied Health Sciences Technology, Pharos University in Alexandria, Alexandria, Egypt

Sara H. Akl & Mohamed S. Abdel-Latif

Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

A.I.M.E.-S., A.M.E.-B., S.A.E.-A., and M.S.A.-L. contributed in study plan and experiments designation. S.H.A. carried over the experimental work under supervision of A.I.M.E.-S. and M.S.A.-L. S.H.A. drafted the manuscript. A.I.M.E.-S., A.M.E.-B., S.A.E.-A., and M.S.A.-L. edited and revised the first draft of the manuscript.

Correspondence to Mohamed S. Abdel-Latif.

The authors declare no competing interests.

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

EL-Sayed, A.I.M., El-Borai, A.M., Akl, S.H. et al. Identification of Lactobacillus strains from human mother milk and cottage cheese revealed potential probiotic properties with enzymatic activity. Sci Rep 12, 22522 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-27003-2

Download citation

Received: 07 July 2022

Accepted: 22 December 2022

Published: 29 December 2022

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-27003-2

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Scientific Reports (2024)

Journal of Food Science and Technology (2024)

Probiotics and Antimicrobial Proteins (2024)